But in the unlikely story that is America, there has never been anything false about hope

Thursday, August 11, 2005

My first political rant

I almost vowed to never do this, but I've been inspired by the book that I am reading right now (not the same book that I got the idea for the post about music with the world's lamest title). First, let me make it very clear that I am socially liberal meaning that I believe that every person in the world has the right to some form of equality. Second, I am somewhat conservative as well since I believe that people are responsible to claim their rights in any way that is possible. Hence, I am not a big fan of things like welfare when it involves a couple that continually pumps out babies because they can't cover it up or put it away. So I am a Green Party member, but I am far from a tree-hugging hippy.

So here's the official rant. The book I am reading is called The Unknown American Revolution by Gary Nash, who is a history professor at UCLA. The book is basically about the lower classes that really drove and fought in the revolution. During the 17th and 18th century there were basically 4 groups of people: rich white colonists, rich white English appointed to serve the King, lower-class whites (artisans, farmers, etc.) and slaves. The "traditional" American patriots that we are taught about in school are usually (but not always) part of the first group. They were all about liberty from the English and didn't want to keep paying unfair taxes, but this book argues that this was more for the goal of financial profit than for the altruistic belief in freedom. So a lot of the stories that I have read involve lower-class groups that only wanted to have a voice in government, maybe not even control it. However, the aristocratic class made every effort to make sure that the colonial tax system would benefit themselves and place the burden of financing the government on the backs of the lower-class while not giving these same lower-class a voice in this system. When complaining didn't work, the masses simply put it right in these rich guys' faces by kidnapping them, burning them in effigy, and by destroying their homes. Sure, many historians argue that this was the result of a highly uneducated class that did not have a great understanding of politics, but I feel that this is the desperate act of a desperate group of people that only wanted what they were entitled to. It was this same group of people that gave their lives in the revolution so that people like Jefferson, Washington, Adams, etc. could go back to their huge estates and their slaves without being harassed by English tax collectors. (I don't really hate these guys, but the truth hurts sometimes)

I am all worked up because I drew a connection between this struggle for independence and the current political situation in the U.S. I'm not going to spend too much time talking about Bush not being elected "fairly", because that is a tired argument and is only true to a point. My complaint today rests with everyone but the hardcore Republicans. We can bitch all we want about the war in Iraq and how revealing the identity of our spies is not a fireable offense, but most of the people that complain do only that. Look at the voting statistics from the last two elections. The greatest turnout is by old white educated rich people (not men, women vote more than men). Our government is successful in screwing over the poor, the minorities, and those who want equality for all people of different races, sexual preference, economic standing, etc. because we don't do enough to stop it. Minorities vote in small numbers. Young people vote in small numbers. Poor people vote in small numbers. Why? Maybe its because we got to choose between which rich old white guy to vote for. Maybe its because the administration hires goons to stop them from voting (not likely in large enough numbers). I argue that its because the people who don't vote are too damn lazy to care. They bitch about not being represented in government, about how they don't get anything because they are _____ (young, black, Mexican, poor, liberal). However, I don't blame them. The "system" has been made so complex and hidden that they don't know what is going on, and that's just how the government likes it. Bush wants "no child left behind," but doesn't help pay for this to happen. Bush wants to protect people from different countries from terrorism, but what about the homeless people in our country that suffer? Let's get freedom for oil-rich Iraq, but not for cotton-rich Africa? Bullshit.

If you've gotten this far, then you are about to be rewarded with the most radical statement I've maybe ever put in writing. We need to start tearing down houses and burning politicians in effigy. We need to make it clear that there are more of us than there are of them. Granted, I am far from being oppressed (middle-class white educated male that votes), but I still want to see this country live out the ideals that we supposedly stands for. If we get 80% voter turnout and the current conservative ideals stay in place, so be it. But at least we'll have 85 million Americans in the majority decide this than the 30 million in the "majority" that do it now. We are so happy to bitch and bitch and bitch, but shit, its about time that we start using the tools that so many people died to get for us. Let's make it simple enough for everyone to understand. Let's teach our kids that rich people don't die for their freedom, poor people do. The 1800+ troops that have died in Iraq were not all ex-NFL players that gave up millions to go sacrifice for their country. I think the same people that do the dying should also be making the decisions, which is something that I would love to see them do.

That's all. Thanks for staying with me.

3 comments:

Pete said...

That was a nice meaty ppost to sink my teeth into. I agree with you that not enough of us are getting mad enough to affect any kind of change in the country. For me the problem lies in two places. Money and lack of education. Our political system and our civilization in general is deeply rooted in economics and not philosohical priciples. We respect those with money and not necessarily those with good ideas. We like to assume that thos who have lots of money must have gotten it by being especially smart. Thats just not true. Crafty maybe but not necessarily wise. Our heroes are movie stars and sports stars and not because of waht they do but because of what they do allows them to HAVE. Even democracy itself shares principles with economics. If enough people want a product more of the product is created. If enough people want, and vote for a certain type o politician we see more of those people in office. Thats why there are so many rich white men in office, because we respect what they have and not thier ideas. If we are going to see a shift in the way we run our society we have to have a major shift in whats important to us.
That leads to the second problem. because not enough people care about ideas not enough people care abot being smart so education becomes a low priority in our society. No matter how much we spout off about how important school is we really don't believe it. We believe that if you can make money without education then you should do it. look at a guy lke Kobe Bryant who could have gone to any college in the nation for free but went straight to the NBA instead. Sure he's a millionaire but is he the guy you'd want to have an itellectual conversation with? Arnold Shwartzenegger is another example and he's one of the most powerful people in the country. We need to value ideas over accomplishements.

Beyond that I think we need to embrace isolationism. I don't think we should anyone our technology putting technology in the hands of those that are not technologically able is one the most dangerous mistakes we've made in the last century. Let world handle its own problems on thier own terms. If the people of Iraq don't have the balls to stand up to one violent dictator, they aren't ready for self rule. Once they gain thier freedom they will eventually arrive in the same place because their freedom wasn't earned, it was given them.

Populism scares me because the population is so damn stupid.

Lauri said...

That was a really long comment Pete! lol

Jeff said...

Good comment Pete. I think that its come to the point that politicians play to the stupidity of the population. They tell us what we want to hear so we'll vote for them. Maybe what we need to hear is not what we want to hear. The Governator told us lots of good things, but when he started to do what he thought the state needed, his popularity went down. The average American wants our country to blow everybody else up if they don't agree with American-style freedom and that only gets us in trouble because the leaders don't have the balls to say just how stupid that is.